Fufa President Moses Magogo Credit: John Batanudde

When FUFA unveiled the new Uganda Premier League (UPL) format, it was meant to signal progress — a step toward a more competitive, organized, and marketable league.

Instead, the rollout has exposed gaps in planning, communication, and coordination between the federation and the clubs

The intention behind reforming the competition structure is commendable. Ugandan football needs innovation to grow. However, the implementation has been poorly managed, leaving clubs uncertain, fixtures frequently altered, and fans frustrated.

Where the process fell short

The main shortcoming has been insufficient consultation and communication. Major structural changes require clear explanation, phased introduction, and stakeholder buy-in.

Instead, clubs were informed through letters and circulars that often came too close to matchdays or without adequate clarity.

FUFA could have handled this better by:

  • Engaging all stakeholders early, including club executives, coaches, referees, and broadcasters, to gather input and assess readiness.
  • Presenting the rationale for reform in a transparent manner — showing how the new system would enhance competition, commercial value, and player welfare.
  • Implementing the format gradually, allowing time for adjustments to scheduling, logistics, and finances.
  • Issuing a clear communication roadmap, complete with timelines, FAQs, and consistent media updates.

Without these steps, the changes have appeared abrupt and reactive, rather than strategic.

The Way Forward

Despite the current challenges, it is not too late to restore order and rebuild confidence in the system. FUFA and the clubs can still realign their efforts to protect the integrity and continuity of Ugandan football.

Rebuild Fan Engagement:
Fans are central to the game’s success. Transparent communication and predictable match scheduling will help restore their trust and encourage attendance.

Hold a Stakeholder Indaba:
FUFA should convene an open forum with clubs, sponsors, referees, and fans’ representatives to discuss the new format, identify pain points, and agree on practical solutions.

Establish a Transitional Oversight Committee:
A small, independent body comprising club officials and league administrators could help coordinate implementation, ensuring transparency and accountability.

Review and Adjust When Necessary:
Reforms are not a sign of weakness but of progress. If aspects of the new format prove unworkable, FUFA should be open to revisiting them after a proper review, guided by data and feedback.

Uganda’s football ecosystem has shown resilience over the years. The current turbulence presents an opportunity — not just to correct mistakes, but to strengthen the governance culture that underpins the game.

Reform is necessary. But it must be guided by dialogue, clarity, and respect for all stakeholders. Only then can the federation and clubs work together to build a football structure that is not just new, but truly sustainable.

Leave a comment

Please let us know what you think